The word “racist” has been bandied about a whole lot in recent months, and a lot of its usage has been singularly unhealthy.
My conviction is that glibly calling people a racist is typically the sign of a weak mind – someone who refuses to work through the slog of principles, convictions, and ideas often proclaims a weak and unearned triumph by tarring the opponent with the term, “racist.” End of discussion? No. End of your credibility.
And, of course, actually being a racist is no less a sign of possessing a weak mind – and a skewed heart. When you view people through some hierarchy of worth based on external characteristics (with you on top, of course), then you don’t deserve a hearing.
If we’re going to have civil discourse as citizens of this country, let’s not fear to call a racist a racist. But, let’s be profoundly hesitant to apply that label to someone who simply disagrees with us.
Let’s take a step back and put “racism” in context. A racist can be defined as someone who believes that there is INHERENT superiority and/or inferiority to be ascribed to human beings due to racial background. It may (or may not) be a subset of xenophobia (fear or dislike of that which is different from oneself).
Racism should also be carefully differentiated from sociological generalizations – that is, fact-based observations about characteristics that mark groupings of peoples in general (but, obviously, with variations and exceptions). Comedians would be out of business without generalizations about men, women, Jews, blacks, whites, Indians, Swedes, and (of course), the French!
Just now, there’s a lot of blather going on regarding whether or not people who disagree with our President are, in fact, motivated by racism. Here’s my take: you’d better have some pretty substantive evidence that any person or grouping of persons is, in fact, “racist” in their opposition as opposed to simply exercising free speech in expressing divergent views. When prominent columnists like Maureen Dowd make this leap, they show an appalling shallowness of thought and civility. Such people have no credibility in political discourse.
By all means, let us debate and discourse vigorously and honestly. But don’t hide like a coward by dismissing those who differ from you as “racists.”
No doubt, there are racists, xenophobes, and uncharitable folks among us, and they come in all colors and from all backgrounds. But when you find it easy to write off entire groups of people opposing political and sociological agendas as “racists” (automatically), then you have fallen into the trap. You display your own xenophobia – these people are different from me (though maybe with a common skin color!), and thus they must be dismissed as lesser beings. That is just as arrogant as blatant racism. Beware.
Whether you consider yourself a superior “liberal” looking down your nose at the uncultured rubes from flyover country, or you identify yourself as a “conservative” patriot despising the coastal communists, beware of despising the “other” by taking cheap shots and self-righteously tossing out labels.
Let’s put the spotlight on principles, not derogatory slogans. Assuming the worst about someone else, or assuming your own superiority, never won an argument. Calling someone a racist or a misogynist just to score points and shut down debate is the ploy of a coward.
Just remember: if you were right, I’d agree with you (I love that statement – had to fit it in here somehow!). But in the meantime, let’s assume that we’re thinking human beings who aren’t inherently inferior to one another. And let’s talk substance instead of talking trash, and playing the racist card.
(Image credit)
UPDATE: It is quite possible for someone who is by no means a racist to get jumped on for making a racist-sounding comment (esp. a sociological generalization). This is a bludgeon used to selectively silence scientists, academics, politicians, and anyone else who dares tread the line of political correctness. Of course, the same principle applies for those with a sexism trigger-finger.
UPDATE 2: For a counter-point perspective, read this post by my friend Shannon Whitely (whom I greatly respect). And let’s have these debates, people – substantive thought and discussion, with mutual respect and readiness to listen. Hostile sound-biting isn’t going to get us anywhere…!
UPDATE 3: A voice of reason and sanity, from of all places, the NY Times: No, It’s not about Race.
————-
Connect with Steve Woodruff
Twitter: @swoodruff