On rare occasions, I will put up a post that touches on politics – sometimes, directly regarding political issues; other times, what political situations can teach us about something even broader.
This post is one of the latter.
I saw on the Facebook wall of one of my friends (yes, I consider him a friend, though we are polar opposites in political leanings!) this statement, cheered on by various comments from others: Didn’t we already learn the Texas Republican Governor lesson? (referring to the imminent entry of Gov. Rick Perry into the presidential race).
I called him out by adding a comment (maybe with a bit of edge to it, I’ll admit!):
I was excoriated by someone else in the thread in the following fashion:
I thought the reply was pretty funny, actually, but it really missed the point I was trying to make – which is that generalizing is bigotry, and it doesn’t simply happen in one direction (and, by the way, I was not maintaining that “the left does all the demonizing” – it’s just that I think liberal acts of demonization are somehow viewed as acceptable among many media and political elitists. How else can we explain the NY Times getting away with repeatedly categorizing tea party folks as terrorists?)
Anyway, let’s use a little basic logic on the original Facebook post, and see where it takes us.
Assumption/opinion – Republican George W Bush, former TX governor and U.S. President, was a colossal disaster.
Fact – Rick Perry is a Republican, a TX governor, and now is running for U.S. President.
Implied conclusion – Perry as President must therefore be another disaster.
Now, many would take issue with the assumption/opinion, but even if one agrees with it – what right does anyone have to generalize that Rick Perry, who is a different individual, should therefore be dismissed out of hand and assumed to be a bad choice? Is it OK to demonize conservatives from middle America – especially Texas (or heaven forbid, Alaska!)?
Note that nothing is stated about Rick Perry’s qualifications, principles, stances, character, or track record, no logical rebuttal is made. He’s just another Republican Texas Governor. Guilt by association.
That’s what I consider a cheap shot. But there are principles much larger at stake, and let’s expand the discussion beyond what this particular person may or may not feel. Everything below is meant to ask questions, broadly, to any who would identify themselves as political “progressives.”
Now, why do I think it’s hypocrisy? Here’s why: what if the original poster had, instead, put this in his Facebook status: Didn’t we already learn the black Democratic Illinois politician lesson? Now what would be the reaction? Think about it. What does your gut tell you?
In a bigoted fashion, that would be dismissing someone via guilt by association. Just throw the race card in there and what happens? Now the knives come out about generalizing!
As for me, I’d vote for an African-American, or Indian, or Hispanic, or half-Chinese, or 3/4 Filipino, or Caucasian woman for president in a heartbeat, no matter what state they came from – as long as I agreed with their principles, witnessed their proven character, and saw a track record of competence that led me to believe they could govern successfully at that level. I would be an ardent Obama supporter if I believed all of that was in place (I never did believe it was).
So, let’s talk about character. Let’s talk about track record. Let’s talk about principles. But to casually flip off people via guilt-by-association cheap shots, or because of what part of the country they’re from? To oppose individuals because of, perhaps, a lingering case of Bush Derangement Syndrome? To regularly call mainstream, productive, patriotic Americans extreme? How is that commendable?
What’s next – demonizing experienced leaders because they’re attractive women, or religious, or from a blue-collar background? Why, that could construed as misogyny. And xenophobia. And bigotry…such behavior would certainly be more regressive than “progressive,” don’t you think?
It’s a free country. Believe what you want, say what you want. But if you think you’re justified calling huge swaths of American citizens bigots, nutcases, racists, and terrorists, because they differ politically from you – take a look in the mirror and see if you like what’s staring back.
Because ultimately, this is not at all about one person’s feelings toward or convictions about Rick Perry or George Bush. It’s about a toxic atmosphere of disrespect. And it doesn’t go in just one direction.
btw – I’m not from Texas or Alaska. I don’t know who I’m going to vote for in the upcoming election – but it will be based on the three main qualifiers mentioned. Any attempt to generalize me into a certain sub-group and thereby make numerous gratuitous assumptions will likely fail to be accurate. And if you choose to respond – reason, logic, and principle are appreciated. Stupid and abusive sound bytes are not.



Spot it, you got it.
Amen. And thanks to Drew McLellan for steering me here. You make a lot of sense, Steve, and I tweeted as much. Unfortunately only some people won’t see the reality no matter how well you show it. But know that some of us do. And thanks for putting our thoughts and feelings into words for us.
While reading through this post I was contemplating going out on a limb and risking a firestorm by commenting what would be thought of generalizations regarding race. But then you did just that. I’m thinking that the reaction wouldn’t REALLY be that much greater, but it would likely seem that it was because the medium or the media is dominated by those that lean in that direction.
I, too, tend to avoid politics. However, given the last 4 years (that’s right – 4… not 3), I’m going to assert myself a little more in this election. If folks unfollow me – so be it. Recently (as with the troll that responded to you), I was given the ‘Tea Party’ talk as well. I’m not part of the tea party movement, but my son was.
I’m proud of my son for peacefully gathering with others who have the same ideas about what government should and should not be. He’s not racist. He just graduated with a Math degree and, ironically, worked for the government for the summer. When people start calling the Tea Party ‘terrorists’, it’s unacceptable. My son never terrorized anyone! I don’t remember anyone from the Tea Party strapping bombs to their chest and blowing up innocent people.
I digress. You are correct Steve. If everyone avoided the parties and the left/right crap and really paid attention, we’d get better people elected. However, the perpetuation of fear, anger, injection of racism, and childish reactions our media and our elected officials are ramping up is what leads to this crap.
The hope and change that Americans voted for didn’t work. The gap between the wealthy and poor grows. We have more troops fighting in unwinnable wars now. The amount of people on welfare grows. The markets are declining. The dollar is weak. Unemployment plagues us. Crime and desperation are taking root all over the world.
One side would have you believe that the problem is the greedy corporation. At the same time, our retirees are losing their pensions and their 401k investments. So… if the cure is to take more from the companies, what do you think will happen to the pensions and 401k’s? Where do you think that money comes from?
That’s not me being racist against Obama or a right-wing extremist… that’s simple fact. If we can’t openly debate these things – we’re in a lot more trouble than we have been.
Rant. over. Thanks for letting me blow off some steam.
Doug, it seems so cliche to talk about a left-wing media fueling this garbage – except that it’s so accurate. I was reading another NY Times Opinion column today where, as usual, the writer was erecting a tea party caricature, then demonizing it. Such talent (where is that sarcasm font?) – and they get paid for it! Yet these are the same folks that cry “hate speech!” when conservatives differ with them over policy. The hypocrisy is breathtaking.
Here’s what bugs me about your post. you took a private conversation based on a joke, quoted people without askibg their permissuon, and then judged them for judging others ( by your rules). It wad wrong, and frankly, it only made me more rsolved to be political.
I hate autotext.
Geoff – you make a valid point. I’ve been deeply troubled by the abusive partisan demonizing that surrounds us and your update happened to be at the wrong place at the wrong time when I boiled over. It was my hope to keep the participants anonymous, but that didn’t end up working out so well.
While I completely stand by the broader point I was seeking to make, if I managed to offend you in the process by weaving your words into it, I apologize.
And you should know that I follow you on-line, not only because of your great pictures (including Soleil) and your business ideals, but also because we DO differ so strongly. I want that check and balance. I would hope that we all do, even if it can be annoying at times… :>}